<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the shape of ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2003/08/the-shape-of-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2003/08/the-shape-of-ideas/</link>
	<description>Sarah Allen's reflections on internet software and other topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:32:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2003/08/the-shape-of-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 23:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasaurus.com/wordpress/?p=42#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Beautiful.  Thank you!

I feel the same way about my code, although I think you&#039;re much more eloquent at describing it.  I frequently explain my conception of a software architecture as being like a landscape, with clear mountains and valleys, of varying shapes and textures.  The criteria I use for deciding whether a design is good or not is how well it molds to the 3D &quot;shape&quot; of the requirements and the libraries it depends upon.

I once considered making a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kimbly.com/code/codepad/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tool&lt;/a&gt;  that would let me work with code directly, and display code the same way that I saw it in my head.  Never went anywhere, though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful.  Thank you!</p>
<p>I feel the same way about my code, although I think you&#8217;re much more eloquent at describing it.  I frequently explain my conception of a software architecture as being like a landscape, with clear mountains and valleys, of varying shapes and textures.  The criteria I use for deciding whether a design is good or not is how well it molds to the 3D &#8220;shape&#8221; of the requirements and the libraries it depends upon.</p>
<p>I once considered making a <a href="http://www.kimbly.com/code/codepad/" rel="nofollow">tool</a>  that would let me work with code directly, and display code the same way that I saw it in my head.  Never went anywhere, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
