Comments on: Scaffolds != Rails http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/ Sarah Allen's reflections on internet software and other topics Sat, 04 Sep 2010 12:10:58 -0700 hourly 1 By: Caffeine Driven Development » Blog Archive » L33t Links #71 http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-1178 Caffeine Driven Development » Blog Archive » L33t Links #71 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:55:06 +0000 http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-1178 [...] Scaffolds != Rails [...] [...] Scaffolds != Rails [...]

]]> By: Sarah http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-630 Sarah Thu, 07 May 2009 00:02:02 +0000 http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-630 Later in email, David & realized that he really did mean monogamous (e.g. one controller to one model), so I changed it back. Later in email, David & realized that he really did mean monogamous (e.g. one controller to one model), so I changed it back.

]]> By: Sarah http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-377 Sarah Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:17:53 +0000 http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-377 Hey David, When I read it I was thinking you meant homogeneous. Funny when a word is out of place it is easy to fill in what you think it means. In any case, I made the correction. Thank for your comments on the list in the first place. I've enjoyed reading your notes on Rails. Sarah Hey David,

When I read it I was thinking you meant homogeneous. Funny when a word is out of place it is easy to fill in what you think it means. In any case, I made the correction. Thank for your comments on the list in the first place. I’ve enjoyed reading your notes on Rails.

Sarah

]]> By: David Black http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-375 David Black Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:08:28 +0000 http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-375 Wow, I really did say "too monogamous" instead of "too monolithic", didn't I? :-) I did mean monolithic, though. David Wow, I really did say “too monogamous” instead of “too monolithic”, didn’t I? :-) I did mean monolithic, though.

David

]]>